<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Lines of Code: Scala and Clojure (FUD version)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fogus.me/2010/01/04/comparing-lines-of-code-scala-and-clojure-fud-version/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fogus.me/2010/01/04/comparing-lines-of-code-scala-and-clojure-fud-version/</link>
	<description>λ λ λ</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:17:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://blog.fogus.me/2010/01/04/comparing-lines-of-code-scala-and-clojure-fud-version/comment-page-1/#comment-15565</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fogus.me/?p=2042#comment-15565</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am also new to Scala.
Not quite sure about the closure test
Why we could not use below in Scala?
I think it&#039;s quite similar to the 29 lines code&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;def addPlus10: Function1[Int, Int] = 10 + _
  addPlus10(9)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also new to Scala.
Not quite sure about the closure test
Why we could not use below in Scala?
I think it&#8217;s quite similar to the 29 lines code</p>

<p>def addPlus10: Function1[Int, Int] = 10 + _
  addPlus10(9)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fogus</title>
		<link>http://blog.fogus.me/2010/01/04/comparing-lines-of-code-scala-and-clojure-fud-version/comment-page-1/#comment-13373</link>
		<dc:creator>fogus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fogus.me/?p=2042#comment-13373</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Josh Cough&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That will be the next post.  :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josh Cough</p>

<p>That will be the next post.  :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel E. Renfer</title>
		<link>http://blog.fogus.me/2010/01/04/comparing-lines-of-code-scala-and-clojure-fud-version/comment-page-1/#comment-13341</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel E. Renfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fogus.me/?p=2042#comment-13341</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t believe you wasted so many lines in your Clojure version.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(((fn mk-adder [x] #(+ % x)) 10) 9)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;only 35 characters and does roughly the same thing. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe you wasted so many lines in your Clojure version.</p>

<p>(((fn mk-adder [x] #(+ % x)) 10) 9)</p>

<p>only 35 characters and does roughly the same thing. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Cough</title>
		<link>http://blog.fogus.me/2010/01/04/comparing-lines-of-code-scala-and-clojure-fud-version/comment-page-1/#comment-13320</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Cough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fogus.me/?p=2042#comment-13320</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;:)
can you do it in reverse too?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:)
can you do it in reverse too?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fogus</title>
		<link>http://blog.fogus.me/2010/01/04/comparing-lines-of-code-scala-and-clojure-fud-version/comment-page-1/#comment-13318</link>
		<dc:creator>fogus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fogus.me/?p=2042#comment-13318</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Gabriel Done!  I will play around later with making the Scala version more monadic.  Thanks for the &lt;em&gt;tips&lt;/em&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gabriel Done!  I will play around later with making the Scala version more monadic.  Thanks for the <em>tips</em>!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

