Comments on: Understanding the Clojure -> macro http://blog.fogus.me/2009/09/04/understanding-the-clojure-macro/ λ λ λ Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:17:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: mindbender1 http://blog.fogus.me/2009/09/04/understanding-the-clojure-macro/comment-page-1/#comment-39609 mindbender1 Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:49:06 +0000 http://blog.fogus.me/?p=1967#comment-39609 <p>http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Clojure_Programming/Examples/API_Examples/Macros</p> <p>helps further with examples.</p> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Clojure_Programming/Examples/API_Examples/Macros

helps further with examples.

]]> By: Woody Smith http://blog.fogus.me/2009/09/04/understanding-the-clojure-macro/comment-page-1/#comment-36346 Woody Smith Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:27:23 +0000 http://blog.fogus.me/?p=1967#comment-36346 <p>Understanding Clojure API is useful for each function/ macro. Some macros can be explained with just one line of code and I was thinking if this was the process threads. But I guess some API is missing on examples for each function/macro.</p> Understanding Clojure API is useful for each function/ macro. Some macros can be explained with just one line of code and I was thinking if this was the process threads. But I guess some API is missing on examples for each function/macro.

]]> By: Anderson De Andrade http://blog.fogus.me/2009/09/04/understanding-the-clojure-macro/comment-page-1/#comment-34892 Anderson De Andrade Tue, 09 Aug 2011 01:28:04 +0000 http://blog.fogus.me/?p=1967#comment-34892 <p>Clojure API is missing examples for each function/macro.</p> <p>Some macros can be explained with just one line of code instead of juicy paragraphs. "Threads the expr through the forms": I was thinking of processing threads.</p> Clojure API is missing examples for each function/macro.

Some macros can be explained with just one line of code instead of juicy paragraphs. “Threads the expr through the forms”: I was thinking of processing threads.

]]> By: fogus http://blog.fogus.me/2009/09/04/understanding-the-clojure-macro/comment-page-1/#comment-10399 fogus Sun, 06 Sep 2009 00:54:46 +0000 http://blog.fogus.me/?p=1967#comment-10399 <p>@Hugo @Andera</p> <p>D'oh! Serves me right for not re-REPLing the problem after changing it during the course of the modifications. :(</p> <p>Thanks for the comments. -m</p> @Hugo @Andera

D’oh! Serves me right for not re-REPLing the problem after changing it during the course of the modifications. :(

Thanks for the comments. -m

]]> By: Craig Andera http://blog.fogus.me/2009/09/04/understanding-the-clojure-macro/comment-page-1/#comment-10393 Craig Andera Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:51:35 +0000 http://blog.fogus.me/?p=1967#comment-10393 <p>(-> (/ 144 12) (* ,,, 4 (/ 2 3)) str keyword (list ,,, :33))</p> <p>evaluates to</p> <p>(:32 :33)</p> <p>for me. :)</p> <p>But thanks for the explanation. I'd be a bit more direct than you were (you very diplomatic, I thought) and state that the doc string for -> sucks. You should submit a patch to it.</p> (-> (/ 144 12) (* ,,, 4 (/ 2 3)) str keyword (list ,,, :33))

evaluates to

(:32 :33)

for me. :)

But thanks for the explanation. I’d be a bit more direct than you were (you very diplomatic, I thought) and state that the doc string for -> sucks. You should submit a patch to it.

]]>