Comments on: Ix syntax for functions http://blog.fogus.me/2008/10/27/ix-syntax-for-functions/ λ λ λ Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:31:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: fogus http://blog.fogus.me/2008/10/27/ix-syntax-for-functions/comment-page-1/#comment-3094 fogus Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:56:34 +0000 http://blog.fogus.me/?p=1038#comment-3094 <p>The syntax is still a work in progress, however what you see here is essentially an inverted S expression.</p> <p>-m</p> The syntax is still a work in progress, however what you see here is essentially an inverted S expression.

-m

]]> By: aaron http://blog.fogus.me/2008/10/27/ix-syntax-for-functions/comment-page-1/#comment-3093 aaron Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:40:03 +0000 http://blog.fogus.me/?p=1038#comment-3093 <p>Interesting syntax, but it bears a strong resemblance to m-expressions. Do you also support a transformation between the two, with Lisp-style lists for ASTs?</p> Interesting syntax, but it bears a strong resemblance to m-expressions. Do you also support a transformation between the two, with Lisp-style lists for ASTs?

]]>