read


read
or learn more

On Lisp -> Clojure (Chapter 4)

Oct 8, 2008

; As always, I will post when the code is “complete”, but my progress can be followed on Github. Also, this post is executable, just copy and paste into a Clojure REPL.

Posts in this series: ch. 2, ch. 2 redux, ch. 3, ch. 4, ch. 5

; pg. 42

;; PG defines a general find function (find2) that given a function and a list, returns both the first matched value and the value returned from the matching function. The most direct translation to Clojure is:

;

(defn findr [f sq]
  (when (seq sq)
    (let [value (f (first sq))]
      (if (nil? value)
        (recur f (rest sq))
        [(first sq) value]))))

(defn evenr [elem]
  (if (even? elem)
    "is even"))

(findr evenr '(1 13 3 4))
(findr evenr '(1 13 3 5)) 
(findr evenr nil) 
;

; pg. 45

;; L@@k: Why rseq not lazy.

;; Clojure really shines with a simple problem like this because it will work on lists, vectors, sorted maps, and strings.

;

(defn last1 [sq]
  (last s))
;

;; Test for a sequence of one element ;

(defn single [sq]
  (and (seq? sq) (not (rest sq))))
;

;; (append1) seems too complicated. It needs some work, but for now it works.

;

(defn append1 [sq elem]
  (if (seq elem)
    (lazy-cons sq elem)
    (concat sq (vector elem))))
;

;; It’s generally frowned on to produce side-effects in Clojure along the lines of what PG’s (conc1) function does, but if you were so inclined it would be done as:

;

(defn conc1 [sq elem]
  (dosync
   (if (seq? elem)
     (ref-set sq (lazy-cons @sq elem))
     (ref-set sq (concat @sq (vector elem))))))

(def x (ref '(4 5 6)))
@x
(conc1 x 4)
@x
;

;

(defn makelist [elem]
  (lazy-cons elem '()))
;

; pg. 47

;

(defn longer [x y]
  (let [cmp (fn [x y]
              (and (seq? x)
                   (or (nil? y)
                       (recur (rest x) (rest y)))))]
    (if (and (seq? x) (seq? y))
      (cmp x y)
      (> (count x) (count y)))))
;

;; The list-comprehension macro supplied by Clojure provides a powerful way to filter a sequence based on a :when or :while. Therefore an implementation of the filter function is trivial.

;

(defn filtr [f lst]
  (for [x lst :when (f x)]
    x))

(filtr even? '(1 2 3 4))
(filtr even? (range 100000)) 
(filtr seq? '(1 2 3 (4 5) 6 [7] 8 (9) "10"))
;

;; (group) could stand to be (a lot) more elegant

;

(defn group [source n]
  (if (zero? n) (pr "error: zero length"))
  
  (let [t (int (/ (count source) n))
        remainder (drop (* n t) source)]
    (lazy-cat 
     (for [i (range t)]
       (take n (nthrest source (* i n))))
     (if (nil? remainder)
       '()
       (list remainder)))))

(group '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7) 4)
(group '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7) 400)
;

; pg. 49

;

(defn flatten [x]
  (if (seq? x)
    (apply concat (map flatten x))
    (list x)))
;

;; Clojure provides a powerful library for walking and editing trees functionally using a structure called a zipper. The library is fairly comprehensive, and its power is apparent in a few minutes playtime. There are a couple of missing features (outlined below), but overall it makes something like PG’s prune function a piece of cake.

;; One feature missing from the zip library is the ability to create a zip structure from any given type of seq-able data structure. That is, before you build a zipper you have to know the form of the data so that you can call one of (seq-zip), (vector-zip), or (xml-zip). This is a minor point overall, but making the prune more generic requires some work up front.

;

(defn zip-util [root]
  (if (seq? root)
    (zip/seq-zip root)
    (zip/vector-zip root)))
;

;; The prune function itself is taken alomst verbatim from the clojure zip examples except for a couple minor changes, one of which is to allow a filter function to decide the pruning as in “On Lisp” plus a call to (zip-util) to handle different types of structures. Another useful feature missing from the zip library is a predicate that can be used to check if a structure is already a zipper. As it stands trying to zip a zipper throws an exception and there was no clear way (that I could find) to perform such a check.

;

(defn prune [f tree]
  (loop [loc (zip-util tree)]
    (if (zip/end? loc)
      (zip/root loc)
      (recur
       (zip/next
        (if (f (zip/node loc))
          (zip/remove loc)
          loc))))))
;

;; PG’s (prune) function works on nodes only, but I thought it might be better to work on branches also. Of course, this breaks the ability to just send in something like (even?), but I think that is a minor tradeoff.

;

(defn node-filter [x]
  (if (zip/branch? x)
    nil
    (even? x)))

(def s '(1 2 (3 (4 5) 6) 7 8 (9)))
(def v [1 2 [3 [4 5] 6] 7 8 [9]])

(prune node-filter s)
(prune node-filter v)
;

; pg. 50

;; PG’s (before) is alomst a direct translation, except for one major difference: Clojure does not have default argument values. Therefore, one must always pass in a test function to get the same effect. I decided to drop the test function for now to simplify the function.

;

(defn before? [x y sq]
  (and sq
       (let [elem (first sq)]
         (if (= y elem)
           nil
           (if (= x elem) 
             sq
             (recur x y (rest sq)))))))

(before? 'b 'c '(1 2 a b c))
(before? 1 'c '(1 2 a b c)) 
(before? 'a 1 '(1 2 a b c)) 


;; This is from CS-101
(defn member [x sq]
  (if (seq sq)
    (if (= x (first sq))
      sq
      (recur x (rest sq)))))

(defn after? [x y sq]
  (let [elem (before? y x sq)]
    (and elem
         (member x elem))))

(after? 'b 'c '(1 2 a b c))
(after? 'c 'a '(1 2 a b c))


(defn duplicate? [obj sq]
  (member obj (rest (member obj sq))))

(duplicate? 'a '(1 2 a b c a d))

;; Needs work
(defn split-if [f sq]
  [(for [x sq :when (f x)] x) (for [x sq :when (not (f x))] x)])

(split-if #(= % 5) '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10))
(split-if #(< % 5) '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10))
(split-if #(> % 500) '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10))
(split-if #(if (< % 7) true false) '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10))
;

;; Something to note: Clojure provides shorhand notation for lambda's containing a single call of #(). This notation allows for the passing of multiple arguments each accessed via the % operator (e.g. %1 %2 etc...)

; pg. 52

;; Continuing with my abuse of the list-comprehension (only until it becomes second nature... any day now), the most function is pretty trivial.

;

(defn most [f sq]
    (let [wins (ref (first sq))
          mx (ref (f @wins))]
      (doall
       (for [x (rest sq) :when (> (f x) @mx)]
         [(dosync (ref-set wins x) (ref-set mx (f x)))]))
      (list @wins @mx)))

(most count '((1 2 3) (1 2))) 
(most count '((1 2 3) (1 2 3 4)))
;

;; It's important to note that the (for) had to be wrapped in a (doall) because the former generates a lazy sequence and will only supply the first argument, therefore you're always going to see the first item in the sequence as the answer without the latter. It took me a while to track this down. :(

;

(defn best [f sq]
  (let [wins (ref (first sq))]
    (last
      (for [x (rest sq) :when (f x @wins)]
        (dosync (ref-set wins x))))))

(best > '(1 2 3 4 5)) 
(best > '(1 2 7 4 5))
(best > nil) 
;

;; But of course, when Rich Hickey looked at my (best) function he gave me a virtual pat on the head and hit me with:

;

(defn best [f xs] (reduce #(if (f %1 %2) %1 %2) xs))
;

;; I remain humbled.

;; So of course, that means that (most) can more elegantly be written as:

;

(defn most [f xs] (reduce #(if (> (f %1) (f %2)) (list %1 (count %1)) (list %2 (count %2))) xs))
;

;; So PG goes on with this vein for a few more pages creating more utlity functions, some of which could be useful later on. PG's main goal for Chapter 4 is to propone the virtues of Bottom-up programming, which I buy, but since my main goal is to learn Clojure and work out the long-dormant FP muscles, I only chose a handful of functions that furthered my goal.

;; Stay tuned for Chapter 5.

;-m

4 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. David Siegel

    Shouldn’t (most) be:

    (defn most [f xs] (let [x (reduce #(if (> (f %1) (f %2)) %1 %2) xs)] [x (f x)]))

  2. Kunjan

    Hi, I am learning clojure. And your posts are very very helpful. Could you tell me why you use lazy to add to the list. I have seen a lot of lazy-cons and lazy-cat. What is the advantage of these?

    Thanks.

  3. @Kunjan,

    One thing to be aware of with these posts — they are hopelessly out of date. My use of lazy-cons is actually no longer legal Clojure code. At the time of this writing it was the way to cons an element onto the head of a sequence in a lazy way. By lazy I mean that the elements of the sequence are not calculated until accessed. Clojure is now mostly lazy and therefore it makes lazy-cons unnecessary. The more appropriate way to do this now is to use lazy-seq like so:

    (def foo (cons (do (println "hi there") 'x) '()))  ;; you will see "hi there" printed... non-lazy
    foo   ;;  you will see (x)
    
    (def foo (lazy-seq (cons (do (println "fff") 'x) '())))  ;; nothing is printed, until...
    foo
    ;; now you will see "hi there" printed during the lookup of foo
    

    Hopefully, that clarifies matters.

    -m

  4. Nevena

    flatten function won’t work. clojure.core 1.2 has the right one.

Reply to “On Lisp -> Clojure (Chapter 4)”